Skip to main content
California Department of Education Logo

Equipment Assistance Grant

Provides background information, grant and application overview, scoring criteria, frequently asked questions, and contact information.

The National School Lunch Program (NSLP) Equipment Assistance Grant is funded by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and administered by the California Department of Education (CDE). The intent of the grant funds is to allow School Food Authorities (SFA) to purchase food service equipment to serve healthier meals that meet the meal pattern requirements, replace outdated or worn equipment, improve procurement of goods, improve food safety, improve the lunchroom to be more appealing to the students, help support the maintenance of an existing kitchen or the establishment of a new school kitchen or School Nutrition Program.

For questions regarding the content of this web page, please contact the Equipment Grant team by email at equipmentgrant@cde.ca.gov.

Scoring Criteria

National School Lunch Program Equipment Assistance Grant Application Scoring Criteria.

Summary of the 100 Point Scoring Criteria

Using the Equipment Assistance Grant (EAG) Application Scoring Worksheet, Nutrition Services Division staff will score applications from school food authorities (SFA) based on the areas identified by the United States Department of Agriculture. The CDE’s Request for Applications is reviewed and approved by the USDA to ensure fairness and accurate language as well as content.

(A) Points for description of the site/s need for the equipment grant (up to 30 points):
  • Up to 30 points for SFAs that provide a strong justification for needing grant funds at their site(s). A strong justification will have specific data and information that supports the site(s) needs. Example of information that can be included could be: equipment has not been replaced in over 15 years; not enough storage space for food service operations and serve healthy meals, the school is in a low-income or underserved area where free/reduced price (F/RP) is X percent; the SFA is experiencing supply chain issues or disruptions; equipment is necessary to implement the Universal Meals program or make the lunchroom more enticing to students.
  • Up to 20 points for SFAs that provide an average justification for grant need. An average justification lacks in specifics but is relevant to the application goals. An example would be equipment is old and outdated and food quality can be improved with new equipment; the equipment grant will allow the school to purchase necessary equipment to start serving breakfast to the students or the equipment is needed to serve universal meals. These statements are informative but lack specific details.
  • Up to 10 points for SFAs that provide a weak justification for grant need. A weak justification lacks specifics and does not adequately describe the need for a grant. Very little to no detail.
(B) Points for description of equipment (up to 30 points):

Documentation in the form of a narrative of how funding will support specified efforts. SFAs will be awarded the most points for providing a strong justification, which includes documentation that the equipment is essential to achievement and how the SFA will sustain improvement in one or more of the following four focus areas:

  1. Serve healthier meals, improve quality, and meet meal patterns
  2. Implement strategies to adopt lunchroom changes that provide convenience and appeal to students to increase meal participation
  3. Purchase new or replace outdated and worn equipment; purchase food service equipment to increase the efficiency of SFA procurement, food storage, and distribution/service
  4. Support the establishment of a new school kitchen or School Nutrition Program
  • Up to 30 points for SFAs that provide a strong justification that the equipment is necessary for achievement in one or more of the four focus areas. A strong justification must include numbers and percentages when identifying needs within the lunch program and how the equipment will help improve the program. A strong application will also emphasize the SFA’s intent to prepare more scratch made and freshly prepared foods. An example of things to include would be current equipment is X number of years old; equipment will allow for on-site preparation of fresh fruits and vegetables, which will increase consumption by 30 percent and reduce produce costs by 20 percent; equipment will expand refrigeration capacity, which will decrease delivery costs and help add in supply chain delays, and with X savings the SFA can buy more refrigeration for implementation of Universal Meals; equipment will allow the site to serve breakfast and expand breakfast participation by at least 90 percent. A strong justification will also define how the SFA will sustain improvement in the four focus areas in detail if awarded the requested equipment. To receive all 30 points, an SFA must specifically document how the equipment will help improve all four focus areas and include lots of details in their narrative.
  • Up to 20 points for SFAs that provide an average justification for the equipment being necessary for making achievements in one or more of the four focus areas. An average justification will draw a strong correlation between the need and effect of equipment but may fail to identify specific numbers or percentages when identifying need and affect. An example would be equipment will allow staff to store foods needed to implement a breakfast program or equipment will allow the school to expand refrigeration capacity so that it can cut down on delivery costs. An average justification will also make mention of how the SFA plans to sustain improvement in the four focus areas, but provide little detail. These statements are informative but lack specific details.
  • Up to 10 points for SFAs that provide a weak justification for why this equipment is necessary for achieving one or more of the four focus areas. A weak justification will lack specifics and does not describe a need for a grant or how the SFA will sustain improvement in the four focus areas. An example would be equipment will increase food safety but applicant fails to describe how; equipment will expand refrigeration capacity but applicant fails to describe how the increased capacity will have an effect on their food service program.
(C) Points for indicating the four focus areas will be addressed by selecting specific bullet points (up to 40 points):
  • 10 points for improving nutritional quality, serving healthier meals, and meeting nutritional standards
    • Equipment will help provide more fruits and vegetables at lunch or breakfast
    • Increases storage space to store more fresh food
    • Enables scratch cooking and freshly prepared foods
    • Purchase equipment to prepare foods in a healthy manner such as steaming, baking, or grilling
  • 10 points for implement strategies to adopt lunchroom changes that provide convenience and appeal to students to increase meal participation
    • Implement strategies to adopt a more appealing lunchroom
    • Implement changes to the lunchroom to make it more convenient to serve meals
    • Implement a way to increase participation
    • Replace or purchase new equipment that will help improve food appearance
  • 10 points for replacing outdated and worn equipment; purchase food service equipment to increase the efficiency of SFA procurement, food storage, and distribution/service
    • Increases energy efficiency with updates equipment
    • Purchase equipment that will increase storage and distribution/ services of meals
  • 10 points for supporting the establishment of a new school kitchen or School Nutrition Program; or for supporting SFAs that did not receive existing state funding for equipment purchases
    • SFA is a new sponsor of the National School Lunch Program/School Breakfast Program (SBP) or added a new school nutrition program this school year (i.e., did not participate in the NSLP or SBP last school year)
    • SFA did not receive infrastructure funds from the 2021 or 2022 Kitchen Infrastructure and Training (KIT) allocation.
Questions:   Equipment Assistant Grants Team | equipmentgrant@cde.ca.gov
Last Reviewed: Monday, August 19, 2024
Related Content
Recently Posted in Nutrition