Skip to main content
California Department of Education Logo

Cafeteria Funds—Indirect Costs


Nutrition Services Division Management Bulletin

Purpose: Policy, Beneficial Information

To: All School Nutrition Program Operators

Attention: Food Service Directors, School Business Officials, County Business Officials

Number: SNP-07-2020

Date: January 2020

Reference: Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations (7 CFR), parts 210 and 220; Title 2, Code of Federal Regulations (2 CFR), part 200; California Education Code (EC) Section 38101; California School Accounting Manual (CSAM); U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Policy Memorandum SP 60-2016: Indirect Cost Guidance

Supersedes: NSD-SNP-07-2013; USDA-SNP-22-2011; NSD-SNP-05-2012

Subject: Cafeteria Funds—Indirect Costs


This Management Bulletin (MB) supersedes the California Department of Education (CDE) MB NSD-SNP-07-2013: Cafeteria Funds—Allowable Uses; sections on direct and indirect costs, NSD-SNP-05-2012: Cafeteria Funds/Accounts-Reminders and Resources; section on charging warehoused goods, and USDA-SNP-22-2011: Indirect Cost Guidance Manual. The purpose of this MB is to reiterate the USDA requirements and provide updated guidance on allowable and unallowable expenditures from the nonprofit school food service account (cafeteria fund) as it pertains to direct and indirect costs. Additional guidance for allowable costs (SNP-05-2020) and construction costs (SNP-08-2020) are available on the CDE’s Cafeteria Fund Guidance web page at https://www.cde.ca.gov/ls/nu/sn/cafefundguide.asp.

Direct and Indirect Costs

Local educational agencies participating in the School Nutrition Programs (SNP) are considered school food authorities (SFA) by the CDE’s Nutrition Services Division (NSD). SFAs must observe both state and federal limitations on the use of cafeteria funds; expend nonprofit school food service revenues in support of the nutrition program; follow generally accepted accounting principles; and adhere to procurement procedures for all cafeteria fund expenditures.

Total program costs charged to the cafeteria fund are made up of direct and indirect costs. A cost’s activity identifies if it is either a direct or indirect cost. Direct costs are those that provide measurable and direct benefits to the program and indirect costs are agency-wide general management costs. An example of direct costs is equipment purchased specifically for a kitchen and used solely by the nonprofit school food service department. Examples of indirect costs are those associated with administrative activities such as accounting, payroll preparation, budgeting, personnel services, or centralized data processing. Indirect costs are not easily assignable, and therefore must be determined through an allocation process.

Determining Indirect Cost Rate

California EC Section 38101(c) states a food service program shall limit indirect costs to using the lesser of a school district’s prior year approved indirect cost rate (ICR) or the statewide average ICR.

Public school districts and county offices of education (COE) should refer to the CSAM Procedure 915 to learn how ICRs are determined. The CDE has been granted authority by the U.S. Department of Education to review and approve ICRs for California public school districts, COE, joint power authorities, and charter schools. Such entities submit proposed ICRs annually to the CDE with unaudited actual financial data. An automated worksheet is used to calculate the approved ICR for each SFA.

For the SFA’s state approved ICR as well as the statewide average ICR please visit the CDE’s Indirect Cost Rates web page at https://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/ac/ic/index.asp.

SFAs not subject to CDE ICR approval will need to determine their ICR in order to compare it to the statewide average approved rate. For detailed guidance on determining your ICR review the USDA Policy Memorandum SP 60-2016: Indirect Cost Guidance which can be found at the USDA Indirect Cost Guidance web page at https://www.fns.usda.gov/indirect-cost-guidance External link opens in new window or tab. .

SFAs that do not charge the lesser of the two ICRs will receive a finding during an administrative review, and a transfer from the general fund to the cafeteria fund will have to be made for the difference between the two rates. If the SFA charges less than either of the two approved rates or does not charge indirect costs at all, these funds cannot be collected in future years, unless there is a preexisting contract in place documenting the SFA was loaning funds to the cafeteria fund. To learn more about loans between the cafeteria fund and other funds please refer to MB SNP-09-2020: Cafeteria Fund—Loans on the CDE SNP MB web page at https://www.cde.ca.gov/ls/nu/sn/mb.asp.

Allowable and Unallowable Charges

All charges to the cafeteria fund will either be direct or indirect, but they cannot be both. If a district is charging administrative costs as a direct cost to the cafeteria fund, those same expenses cannot also be included in the indirect cost allocation.

For example, if an SFA is receiving, storing, or delivering goods requisitioned from a warehouse, the costs associated may be allowable if charged in one of the following three ways:

  1. If a food service program maintains its own warehouse and incurs the overhead costs directly
  2. If a food service program uses the school district’s warehouse and incurs the overhead costs through the SFA’s approved ICR
  3. If a food service program uses the school district’s warehouse and is charged an overhead fee by the SFA based on the cost of goods requisitioned from the warehouse

In addition, SFAs should practice consistent cost treatment. Costs incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances should be treated as only direct or indirect. A cost may not be charged to a program as a direct cost if other costs incurred for the same purpose are allocated to other programs as an indirect cost.

Additional Cafeteria Fund Guidance and Relevant Citations
Contact Information

If you have any questions regarding this MB or cafeteria fund policy or regulations, please contact the Resource Management Unit in the CDE Nutrition Services Division, by email at SNPCafeFundQuestions@cde.ca.gov.

If you have questions about the CSAM or how to account for charges to the cafeteria fund, please contact the School Fiscal Services Division, Financial Accountability and Information Services Unit, by email at sacsinfo@cde.ca.gov.

Questions:   Nutrition Services Division | 800-952-5609
Last Reviewed: Monday, January 22, 2024
Related Content
  • Cafeteria Fund Guidance
    Provides Local Educational Authorities (LEA) with information and instructions pertaining to federal and State statutes and regulations that govern school cafeteria funds.
  • School Nutrition Programs Management Bulletins
    School Nutrition Programs (SNP) management bulletins for sponsors of the National School Lunch Program, School Breakfast Program, Special Milk Program, and State Meal Program.
Recently Posted in Nutrition

  • Universal Breakfast (added 15-Nov-2024)
    This management bulletin provides updated guidance for implementing a Universal Breakfast meal service option when school food authorities are not operating under the Universal Meals Program.
  • 2024–25 FFVP Second Allocation Funding Results (added 12-Nov-2024)
    On October 1, 2024 , the CDE NSD awarded and posted the FFVP second allocation grant recipients and funding allocations for School Year 2024–25 on the CDE FFVP Funding Results web page. The FFVP second allocation is October 1, 2024–June 30, 2025.
  • Ventura County State of Emergency (added 08-Nov-2024)
    Governor Newsom proclaims state of emergency in Ventura County due to Mountain Fire.
  • SUN Bucks Web Page is Now Live (added 07-Nov-2024)
    Helpful information for LEAs regarding the SUN Bucks program.
  • Meal Service During Unanticipated School Closures (added 05-Nov-2024)
    The MB was revised to update contact information. Policy guidance has not changed for the School Nutrition and Summer Food Service Programs and remains current.